e-mzungu
commented
13 years ago Do you think that someone will use byte[] as a key? And moreover Redis protocol based on the strings...
Anyway, do you want to see something like this:
public interface RedisOperations {
String set(String key, String value);
byte[] set(byte[] key, byte[] value);
String get(String key);
byte[] get(byte[] key);
...
}
Or it will be enough for you propose to migrate to binary API only in org.idevlab.rjc.RedisCommands? I mean:
public interface RedisCommands extends MultiExecCommands {
void set(byte[] key, byte[] value);
void get(byte[] key);
byte[] getBulkReply();
...
}
costin
Hi,
I'm looking at integrating rjc into Spring Data Key Value but found that there is no binary API (only Strings can be used currently). This prevents non-common data (binary or simply data outside the encoding charset) to be encoded before being used with this client. Having access to byte[] to both keys and values gives full access to the underlying storage and opens up more possibilities.