Closed amitantony closed 4 months ago
@wahln if this test for the BED projection is sufficient and makes sense ill write one for all the other projections too with the same template.
i noticed that compared to how the original pull request was done, we are using single fraction effect, originaly we used the total fraction effect, so basically always multiply the effect by n, i think either way is fine though. Original the BED projection also work wiht a const RBE model for protons or photons this is no longer the case is that wanted?
Original the BED projection also work wiht a const RBE model for protons or photons this is no longer the case is that wanted?
I think that there's some bigger considerations by @remocristoforetti about revising the biological models. Then we need to probably adapt. But it's true that one could add support for constRBE again here. In the projection, one could just check for a constant RBE value in the dij or have some switch in the projection.
Original the BED projection also work wiht a const RBE model for protons or photons this is no longer the case is that wanted?
I think that there's some bigger considerations by @remocristoforetti about revising the biological models. Then we need to probably adapt. But it's true that one could add support for constRBE again here. In the projection, one could just check for a constant RBE value in the dij or have some switch in the projection.
i rember that i had a check in the effect projection
reimplementation of Jenny's PR #534 into the new matRad file structure