dlohmeier
commented
5 months ago I think I need to make some corrections. It seems that the problem is not with the connectivity check. Here is the code I used for testing:
import pandapipes
import pandas as pd
def create_test_net():
"""
Create a test network with flow and return, connected through one circ pump pressure
on the infeeder side and 5 heat consumers on the consumer side, which consist of a flow
control valve and a heat exchanger each.
Returns
-------
"""
net = pandapipes.create_empty_network("district_heating")
pandapipes.create_junctions(
net, 17, 10, 400, name=[f"Junction {i + 1}" for i in range(17)], index=list(range(1, 18))
)
pandapipes.create_pipes_from_parameters(
net, [1, 3, 3, 3, 3, 8, 11, 14, 17, 5], [3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 5, 5, 5, 5, 2],
0.2, 0.1, name=[f"Pipe {i + 1}" for i in range(10)], alpha_w_per_m2k=1
)
pandapipes.create_circ_pump_const_pressure(
net, 2, 1, name="Circ Pump", p_flow_bar=10, plift_bar=7, t_flow_k=400
)
pandapipes.create_flow_controls(
net, [3, 6, 9, 12, 15], [4, 7, 10, 13, 16], 0.5, 0.1, name=[f"Flow Control {i + 1}" for i in range(5)]
)
pandapipes.create_heat_exchangers(
net, [4, 7, 10, 13, 16], [5, 8, 11, 14, 17], 0.2, 20000, name=[f"Heat Exchanger {i + 1}" for i in range(5)]
)
pandapipes.create_fluid_from_lib(net, "water", overwrite=True)
return net
def check_connectivity():
net = create_test_net()
oos_junctions = [6, 15, 16, 17]
net.junction.loc[oos_junctions, "in_service"] = False
# oos_pipes_junctions = [(3, 9), (3, 12), (14, 5)]
oos_pipes_junctions = [(3, 12), (14, 5)]
for from_junction, to_junction in oos_pipes_junctions:
net.pipe.loc[(net.pipe.from_junction == from_junction)
& (net.pipe.to_junction == to_junction), "in_service"] = False
pandapipes.pipeflow(net, mode="all")If we use the first oos_pipes_junctions definition including the pipe between junctions 3 and 9 and set it out of service, the pipeflow fails in the hydraulic calculation. The problem here should be that a flow control is not being supplied by any upstream source or slack (slack also including circulation pumps). All other cases seem to be working, i.e. if junctions 15, 16 and 17 are just set out of service, they will be set in service again by the connectivity check, as they area connected to in service branches. That's just fine. And since all branches between junctions 12 and 14 are set out of service by the connectivity check, the flow control does not induce any flow there. So what we really need here is a toolbox function that can find flow controllers without any upstream source or slack. I will try to provide an example for this.
Describe the bug In case the connectivity check sets parts of the network out of service, flow controllers (and heat consumers) might prevail in the pit structure, even though connected to junctions removed by the connectivity check. This could probably be easily avoided.
To Reproduce I will try to provide a good example soon. I am not yet sure which types of disconnection (only one-sided, while still connected to an in service junction on the other side, or also for both oos junctions, only in connectivity check or also when given oos junctions in the net model, ...) lead to this error, and I will try to analyze this in the example.
Error message hp.pandapipes.pf.pipeflow_setup - INFO: Setting the following nodes out of service for hydraulics calculation in connectivity check: In table junction: [21, 25, 98, 100, 254, 255, 256, 257, 259, 261, 263, 264, 265, 266, 269, 272, 274, 276, 278, 279, 280, 281, 282, 284, 286, 288, 290, 291, 292, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297, 298, 299, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 997, 999, 1058, 1060, 1083, 1087, 1122, 1124, 1126, 1127, 1128, 1129, 1130, 1131, 1132, 1133, 1134, 1135, 1136, 1137, 1138, 1139, 1140, 1141, 1142, 1143, 1144, 1145, 1188, 1190, 1192, 1194, 1220, 1221, 1222, 1223, 1224, 1225, 1226, 1227, 1232, 1234, 1237, 1239, 1245, 1247, 1264, 1266, 1268, 1270, 1276, 1278, 1280, 1282, 1359, 1363, 1400, 1402, 1404, 1406, 1409, 1411, 1472, 1474, 1476, 1478, 1481, 1483, 1484, 1486, 1716, 1717, 1722, 1723, 1724, 1726, 1987, 1989, 1991, 1993, 1995, 1997, 1999, 2001, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2080, 2079, 2016, 2017, 2037, 2036, 2032, 2033, 2047, 2046, 2013, 2004, 2012, 2005, 2140, 2141, 2102, 2103, 2159, 2160, 2181, 2182, 2123, 2121, 2130, 2131, 2165, 2167, 2169, 2170, 2173, 2174, 2175, 2176] /home/daniel/workspace/pandapipes/src/pandapipes/pipeflow.py:231: MatrixRankWarning: Matrix is exactly singular x = spsolve(jacobian, epsilon) dgstrf info 2013 dgstrf info 2 dgstrf info 2 dgstrf info 2 dgstrf info 2 dgstrf info 2 dgstrf info 2 dgstrf info 2 dgstrf info 2 dgstrf info 2 dgstrf info 2 Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in
pandapipes.pipeflow(net)
File "/home/daniel/workspace/pandapipes/src/pandapipes/pipeflow.py", line 98, in pipeflow
raise PipeflowNotConverged("The hydraulic calculation did not converge to a solution.")
pandapipes.pf.pipeflow_setup.PipeflowNotConverged: The hydraulic calculation did not converge to a solution.
Expected behavior The incorrectly connected flow controllers should be set out of service, so that they don't induce any flow.
Python environment (please complete the following information):