Closed jtenavidal closed 8 months ago
make;./plot_e4nuanalysis --mc_location /Users/juliatenavidal/Desktop/Postdoc/e4nu/PionAnalysis/1p1pi/mc_files/ --input_mc_files e4nuanalysis_1p1pimanalysis_G18_10a_Q2_04_e_on_1000060120_2261MeV_NoRad_wsmearing --analysis_id 1p1pim --observable_list ECal --nofsi_file e4nuanalysis_1p1pimanalysis_G18_10a_NoFSI_Q2_04_e_on_1000060120_2261MeV_NoRad --output_location /Users/juliatenavidal/Desktop/Postdoc/e4nu/PionAnalysis/1p1pi/ --output_name "test_nosmearing" --data_location /Users/juliatenavidal/Desktop/Postdoc/e4nu/PionAnalysis/1p1pi/data_files/ --input_data_file e4nuanalysis_1p1pimanalysis_e_on_1000060120_2261MeV_4MaxBkgMult_clas6data --add-systematics Normalization,0.1
We cannot correct for the momentum without causing a model dependence. Apply in each model for comparison. Must give prescription for other event generators
I think we need to smear the truth so that the peak at the beam energy does not visually dominate everything. (When we correct for the acceptance, we should not correct for the detector smearing.)