Closed jtenavidal closed 1 month ago
neutron detection efficiency is taken from simulation and it has not been measured It could be there is a problem on the simulation caluclation
Area normalized to data Say no renormalization
Not been measured before - key input 2p2h calculations
Semi adv. division btw neutrons and protons
Total momentum distributions MC wider ratio similar trends - different normalization. Shape approximately right and normalization wrong
5min
You knock out a pair (Pmiss is the momentum of the initial nucleon) very mixed with FSI and other hadron production
Read paper:
Large peak in overlap in DIS
Neutron multiplicity Show only one? It is MC Low detection efficiency for neutrons - not there yet
Measuring multiplicity with low efficiency is hard
Because we are dominated by DIS, what we measure is how good GENIE does in hadronizing DIS How well does it distribute neutrons and protons - looks quite good
Combination of Hadronization and FSI that GENIE is doing ok
DIfferent drop also shows in ratio as a rise
very new major theme
Comments from Steve:
Explain HEPMC3
Decide Journal - technical paper.
Reorganize introduction - first section neutrino needs / what we know to electron scattering / how to apply to neutrino
Shape well simulated but ration is off by 20 % - either because of neutron detection efficiency or actual physics