Closed hidmic closed 4 years ago
As far as I can see, nothing has changed about foonathan_memory_vendor since the QD was last updated, but it was previously meeting the QL3 criteria and this update reflects that?
As far as I can see, nothing has changed about foonathan_memory_vendor since the QD was last updated, but it was previously meeting the QL3 criteria and this update reflects that?
AFAIU that is correct. A QL3 package can have a >QL3 dependency as per REP-2004.
A QL3 package can have a >QL3 dependency as per REP-2004.
I'm either confused about what the dependency relationship has to do with the change or I'm mistaken about the effect of this PR.
I'm either confused about what the dependency relationship has to do with the change or I'm mistaken about the effect of this PR.
Probably didn't provide enough information. My bad.
The foonathan_memory_vendor
package is already QL3 according to REP-2004. I presume it was not marked as such before this patch either due to a misunderstanding about the requirements on its dependencies or, most likely, an omission.
Your initial assesment:
nothing has changed about foonathan_memory_vendor since the QD was last updated, but it was previously meeting the QL3 criteria and this update reflects that?
is correct.
Appreciate the clarification. That all makes sense to me.
Since this is a documentation-only change I don't see a need for CI.
Precisely what the title says.