Closed grantmacken closed 5 years ago
I wasn't asking for anything that complex :-) I still wanted the tests to run sequentially
while i m not opposed to the idea of using tap, my main concern is with improving parallel execution of our tests-suite on travis first. As it stands even the three smoke tests could be run in parallel, especially functional test should take advantage of paralleliml. i ll have to think a bit more about how to best run tests locally, but won't get around to it in the next two weeks.
30 @adamretter
As it stands now, the script blocks run sequentially,. Each travis script block should either succeed or fail,
When the script block fails, the travis build will fail What I think I could do is
This way we could test locally (and in travis ), by calling prove and getting a nice tap report. A setup and tear down stage could be done via simple Makefile