3 references, the 3rd one (NIL) being more complex : commentary between () ; 2 etymological hypotheses ordered as high, then low, both possibles ("or" & ?). 1 different information per line for this complex reference. The content/commentary of NIL is summarized between ().
HPN 7+11
Ferrary, Onomatologos, p. 36.
NIL, s.v. _meg-
(_mgh2-dhó-, Pinault, _MSS38, p. 166)
or LIV2_, s. v. *geh2dh- ?
Many thanks, Magdalena. I have to think now about (again) the 2 columns Structure and Semantics, which still does not work well.
I come back to you on this subject as soon as possible.
Best,
Sophie
3 references, the 3rd one (NIL) being more complex : commentary between () ; 2 etymological hypotheses ordered as high, then low, both possibles ("or" & ?). 1 different information per line for this complex reference. The content/commentary of NIL is summarized between ().
HPN 7+11 Ferrary, Onomatologos, p. 36. NIL, s.v. _meg- (_mgh2-dhó-, Pinault, _MSS38, p. 166) or LIV2_, s. v. *geh2dh- ?
Many thanks, Magdalena. I have to think now about (again) the 2 columns Structure and Semantics, which still does not work well. I come back to you on this subject as soon as possible. Best, Sophie