Open tuurma opened 3 years ago
Πιστικός
Συδδηνος
Σαθηφελας
Σαβαυν
Dear @RichardLGPN if you could check the above samples for FB with n.pr.?
for correctness?
Example 1. n.pr.? should not be bracketed
Example 2. after (gen.) n.pr.? should be connected by long dash not bracketed : i.e. (gen.) -- n.pr.?
Example 3. Correct
From: Magdalena Turska notifications@github.com Sent: 27 January 2021 18:13 To: eXistSolutions/LGPN LGPN@noreply.github.com Cc: Richard Catling richard.catling@classics.ox.ac.uk; Mention mention@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [eXistSolutions/LGPN] n.pr. should appear in brackets (#293)
Dear @RichardLGPNhttps://github.com/RichardLGPN if you could check the above samples for FB with n.pr.? for correctness?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/eXistSolutions/LGPN/issues/293#issuecomment-768474783, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEM3RZX2CJIKCBK6GE5C7WDS4BJUTANCNFSM4WVMVPIA.
I could add brackets around, just for cases where FB doesn't contain anything else I'd need to strip them again. Is it a valid use case though? Just to have n.pr.? See last example below, Σαβαυν.
Current state:
Originally posted by @tuurma in https://github.com/eXistSolutions/LGPN/issues/292#issuecomment-758555574