Open tuurma opened 3 years ago
What we store in LGPN in Reference.abbr - Details - Line
will need to be retrieved from TM.tex_id - publication - line
but there is no 1:1 relationship between any of these fields. Atm I assume we'll need to:
groups of values related to given_name, double_name, triple_name, pseudo1, pseudo2, pseudo3
will be converted to attested forms; type of the original TM section will be preserved in TM_type field and respective ids in TM_VAR and TM_CASE; connection with the TM.ref_id via TM_REFERENCE (and corresponding TM_REF on bibl entry). This should allow us for round trip between TM and LGPN
Each of TM.per_id_father, _mother, etc will be converted to a relation entry. TM id will be preserved in dedicated TM_REF field on relation.
Unlike text dating, which comes both in human readable and normalized y-m-d forms, the floruit field lacks normalization and would be very difficult to automatically map to LGPN named period or year range mechanisms. Is it possible to export normalized dates for floruit field from TM?
LGPN basic data structures (attempt at representation in ERD notation)
TM_
- new fields to accommodate Trismegistos data*
suffix, require some processing (e.g. line)*
prefix, it stands for a range of TM fields for names (e.g. given_name, double_name)