eXtensibleCatalog / test

Testing
MIT License
0 stars 0 forks source link

Browse pages need Title field indexed and as 2nd sort #107

Closed patrickzurek closed 7 years ago

patrickzurek commented 7 years ago

JIRA issue created by: rcook Originally opened: 2011-12-15 09:24 PM

Issue body: (nt)

This issue has attachments associated with it (external link): browse1.png browse2.png

patrickzurek commented 7 years ago

JIRA Comment by user: rcook JIRA Timestamp: 2011-12-15 09:25 PM

Comment body:

Dave and Jennifer, please confirm that we want the “Title� ordering as 2nd level ordering for each of the Title, Language, Director, and Genre tabs. Only the keyword search should have relevancy ordering.

patrickzurek commented 7 years ago

JIRA Comment by user: jbowen JIRA Timestamp: 2011-12-15 09:51 PM

Comment body:

Yes, for THIS Browse interface (Videos and DVDs) I think the sort should be Title for all of these tabs.

A library might want to sort on a different element for a differently-configured Browse tab, though, although I think Title could be the default as it would be the most common choice.

patrickzurek commented 7 years ago

JIRA Comment by user: dlindahl JIRA Timestamp: 2011-12-20 05:43 PM

Comment body:

agree with jennifer

patrickzurek commented 7 years ago

JIRA Comment by user: rcook JIRA Timestamp: 2012-01-25 08:33 PM

Comment body:

Status?

patrickzurek commented 7 years ago

JIRA Comment by user: rcook JIRA Timestamp: 2012-03-20 02:44 PM

Comment body:

Is this done in the 1.2 candidate or not?

patrickzurek commented 7 years ago

JIRA Comment by user: pkiraly JIRA Timestamp: 2012-03-21 02:19 PM

Comment body:

What was missing is to put the dcterms__title_s field into the default sortables field list. Now the fresh install will contain it, and the title in DVD browse will be working correctly. The demo site requires a reindex.

patrickzurek commented 7 years ago

Issue resolved: 2012-03-21 02:19 PM