search

ea-east / east-biblio

Bibliographic data for EAST
Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 International
0 stars 2 forks source link

Add Traikālyaparīkṣā to EAST? (Not in SUEBS) #17

Open paddymcall opened 4 years ago

paddymcall commented 4 years ago

Concerning Peking 5705: Dignāga's Traikālyaparīkṣā is not mentioned in SUEBS, probably because it is not a pramāṇa work and largely just a remodeling of several verses from Bhartṛhari. In the introduction to SUEBS, p. XVI, Steinkellner and Much argue for their inclusion of two of Dignāga’s early works, the *Upādāyaprajñaptiprakaraṇa and the Ālambanaparīkṣā, on the grounds that these had a strong influence on the Pramāṇasamuccaya. Following this strategy, we should expect all of Dignāga’s early and not-quite-pramāṇa works to be excluded from SUEBS. However, given that recent research on the Pramāṇasamuccaya has shown how strong an influence Bhartṛhari had on the ideas developed there, I’d suggest to include this work in EAST too, with a note cautioning that, acc. to Frauwallner (1959, https://east.ikga.oeaw.ac.at/bib/5484/, p. 115), it contains two ideas that diverge from his later positions: first, Dignāga there holds that cognition is unchanging (“ewig und unveränderlich”, /rnam par mi ’gyur ba/); second, Dignāga does not differentiate there between perception and conceptual cognition.

1) [x] Add to EAST for Dignāga 2) [ ] Add to bibliography 3) [ ] Add http://www.jits-ryukoku.net/data/20/ick20_nasu.pdf, in the correct relation (@pchiou6932)

As you, Patrick, pointed out already, {Peking} 5705 is missing. The following bibliographical data should be added: dus gsum brtag pa {co ne ce 87a6–88b2; {Peking} 5705 ce 179a4–180b1; sde dge 4207 ce 87b2-88b5; snar thang ce 182a3-183b1}

Originally posted by @JamieCreek in https://github.com/ea-east/east-biblio/issues/5#issuecomment-610438631

pchiou6932 commented 4 years ago

Following this line, I would like to come back to an issue we discussed before, namely, to include works of the thinkers of the Pramāṇa tradition that are not pramāṇa-oriented but contain considerable discussions related to pramāṇa, ex. Kamalaśīla's Madhyamakāloka. Maybe we can create a new category for this kind of works, labeling them as ''pramāṇa-related treatises''?

kellner commented 4 years ago

I agree that the Traikālyaparīkṣā should be included. For other works, criteria are needed. I would propose that a list of such works that are currently not included, but should be included, is produced, and that this list is discussed at our next meeting.

kellner commented 3 years ago

We are still waiting on a list for this, I guess.