Closed GraylinKim closed 10 years ago
Hey, thanks for the pull request.
In general, I prefer commits which do only one thing at a time. Some people call these kind of commits "atomic". Here fixing iteritems is clearly one atomic operation, and changing the empty file write from "" to b'' is another.
Would you mind going into further detail about that second change, changing ""
to b''
? It isn't clear to me at a glance as to what it's going to change or fix.
Just to add a little detail: by separating the atomic commits from each other, I can pull these changes separately. I could in theory also decline to pull a commit or more likely ask for further refinements for a single commit. In case something goes wrong I can rollback a single atomic commit without worrying about what else will break.
Since in this case it's such a trivial operation, I'll fix the iteritems issue myself.
Just one additional thought: we really do need some rudimentary tests for all supported switches to really make sure that mpyq keeps working on both Python 2 and Python 3 in the future. This was broken for a long time.
I'll roll up my sleeves.
Okay, that's fine. I guess I got a little bit lazy with my commit. As described in the new commit. The b'' indicates that the empty string is a bytes object (instead of a string object) in python3 and is ignored in python2.
You can only write byte strings to files opened in binary mode in python3.
Thanks for your work, released 0.2.5 with these fixes.
(I need to add an archive with empty files to the test suite.)
Discovered these additional python3 issues while using the command line options.