Closed martinmueller39 closed 4 years ago
I’m on board — and with either proposed version of the second suggestion. On Nov 10, 2019, at 8:15 PM, martinmueller39 notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:
I would like to propose two changes on the splash page:
Replace 'read and correct' with 'read and edit'. That lets undergraduates look forward to a career as editors rather than correction officers,
Replace " annotated and deeply searchable cultural archive" with "linguistically annotated and deeply searchable text archive." I would also be happy with "linguistically annotated and deeply searchable corpus". That language is a little more precise and gives a clearer signal about the use of corpus query tools.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/earlyprint/earlyprint.github.io/issues/22?email_source=notifications&email_token=AMBORAVD55TTUUHIPBMXCXTQTC54RA5CNFSM4JLPSTR2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFUVEXG43VMWVGG33NNVSW45C7NFSM4HYJJAPA, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMBORATTRJT6PGHRJ7B5GXTQTC54RANCNFSM4JLPSTRQ.
I can make these changes in the next day or two. I prefer "linguistically annotated and deeply searchable text archive," if no one has any objections.
Does "edit" rather than "correct" suggest a more complex procedure? I like the idea of inviting undergraduates into the process and critical thinking required for editing, but does it have the potential to intimidate students, evoking a long, multi-step process? The advantage of "correct" as I see it is that it suggests easy-to-make, atomic units of scholarly intervention.
John,
I thought about the issue you raise about editing and understand your concern about ‘intimidate’. But it may also encourage, and it’s worth the risk.
On second thoughts, I also prefer ‘corpus’. It gestures towards the distinct affordances offered by a ‘corpus’ . Here to there is a risk. Text archive is a more comfortable term for humanists. But ‘corpus’ within the vicinity of ‘linguistic’ points to opportunities, and I think that’s worth doing
From: JR Ladd notifications@github.com Reply-To: "earlyprint/earlyprint.github.io" reply@reply.github.com Date: Monday, November 11, 2019 at 9:27 AM To: "earlyprint/earlyprint.github.io" earlyprint.github.io@noreply.github.com Cc: Martin Mueller martinmueller@northwestern.edu, Author author@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [earlyprint/earlyprint.github.io] changes on the splash page (#22)
I can make these changes in the next day or two. I prefer "linguistically annotated and deeply searchable text archive," if no one has any objections.
Does "edit" rather than "correct" suggest a more complex procedure? I like the idea of inviting undergraduates into the process and critical thinking required for editing, but does it have the potential to intimidate students, evoking a long, multi-step process? The advantage of "correct" as I see it is that it suggests easy-to-make, atomic units of scholarly intervention.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_earlyprint_earlyprint.github.io_issues_22-3Femail-5Fsource-3Dnotifications-26email-5Ftoken-3DABL7ULZKQTFFDWOTFM2WLFLQTF2VDA5CNFSM4JLPSTR2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEDXFJZY-23issuecomment-2D552490215&d=DwMCaQ&c=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws&r=rG8zxOdssqSzDRz4x1GLlmLOW60xyVXydxwnJZpkxbk&m=SypAIKB79Fxmt3rfHoEnhSVnx-1Zy0kbXp38R4s_9Uo&s=CVMxDV2NcEytq19uwvpydor59hf-ZNj1Oiwz3wNi4bo&e=, or unsubscribehttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_notifications_unsubscribe-2Dauth_ABL7UL2R4Z7AEGP6TFF5QODQTF2VDANCNFSM4JLPSTRQ&d=DwMCaQ&c=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws&r=rG8zxOdssqSzDRz4x1GLlmLOW60xyVXydxwnJZpkxbk&m=SypAIKB79Fxmt3rfHoEnhSVnx-1Zy0kbXp38R4s_9Uo&s=66tSwRRRZNrkpDuXkgh_6DzEYpWAUlKBS6YRO7BIDc8&e=.
Makes sense to me!
I would like to propose two changes on the splash page:
Replace 'read and correct' with 'read and edit'. That lets undergraduates look forward to a career as editors rather than correction officers,
Replace " annotated and deeply searchable cultural archive" with "linguistically annotated and deeply searchable text archive." I would also be happy with "linguistically annotated and deeply searchable corpus". That language is a little more precise and gives a clearer signal about the use of corpus query tools.