Closed paraseba closed 4 weeks ago
We want this to avoid conflicts in (at least) two scenarios:
This is not strictly needed, we could "renumber" the nodes as we merge them, but it would increase complexity.
The downside of this change: slightly bigger type for nodes, slightly more cloning.
WARNING: this is an on-disk format breaking change, Icechunk versions with this change cannot read repositories written with previous versions.
We want this to avoid conflicts in (at least) two scenarios:
This is not strictly needed, we could "renumber" the nodes as we merge them, but it would increase complexity.
The downside of this change: slightly bigger type for nodes, slightly more cloning.
WARNING: this is an on-disk format breaking change, Icechunk versions with this change cannot read repositories written with previous versions.