Closed marty-larocque closed 5 years ago
@lwasser could you take a look at this? Looks like the appveyor test is failing for the same reason as before, but I only changed the comments on one file, so this pull request shouldn't affect testing results anyway. Thanks!
this is great. If you update from this fork / master branch @ryla5068 it may fix things. when you are working again on this please give this a shot! it seemed to work for me so far but ... let's see!
Merging #107 into master will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
n/a
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #107 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 59.25% 59.25%
=======================================
Files 13 13
Lines 1205 1205
=======================================
Hits 714 714
Misses 491 491
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
matplotcheck/base.py | 79.23% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 89c7bdb...d43c084. Read the comment docs.
thanks @ryla5068 !! merging this!
Updated docstrings for the base module.
Here is a pdf of the updated documentation: matplotcheck package — matplotcheck 0.0.10 documentation.pdf
This should resolve issue #102