Closed amotl closed 1 year ago
Base: 55.89% // Head: 55.89% // No change to project coverage :thumbsup:
Coverage data is based on head (
a3540c7
) compared to base (4fae26d
). Patch has no changes to coverable lines.
:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
Oh, and you will also have to update the ldi_network
database view.
luftdatenpumpe database \
--network=ldi \
--target=postgresql://luftdatenpumpe@localhost/weatherbase \
--create-views --grant-user=grafana
Hi @amotl ,
i was wrong with the "District" at OSM it is the Tag "suburb".
i have change it to:
concat(concat_ws(', ', osm_suburb, osm_postcode, osm_city), ' ', sensor_id_suffix) AS suburb_postcode_city_sensorid
And it looks good, but how is it possible to remove the comma between postcode and city?
Would it be possible to write the PM10 and PM2.5 values in the next line?
Thanks, Oliver
Hi again,
thanks. Let's continue the discussion about this topic and its refinement at https://community.panodata.org/t/luftdatenpumpe-aiming-to-focus-on-sensor-id-instead-of-station-id/254/11.
With kind regards, Andreas.
However, there is the problem that the sensor ID of the PM or the temperature/humidity sensor is sometimes displayed. The ID of the PM sensor should always be used.
Thank you. I have diverted your report to GH-57.
Dear @ohobby,
at Luftdatenpumpe: Aiming to focus on sensor id instead of station id, you asked about a different formatting of the popup label when displaying measurement values on the Panodata Map Panel.
This patch adds a corresponding improvement.
The new field can then be used on the step when exporting station metadata from PostGIS to JSON for the map panel:
You can update the installation within your virtualenv to the version within this branch on GitHub by running:
With kind regards, Andreas.