Closed AljoschaMeyer closed 8 months ago
Seems like more of a policy decision, really...
We just manually report when a spec status changes
I meant that feed 1 becomes the changes-to-candidate-specs feed, whereas feed 2 is the all-changes feed.
We just don't report typos and errors
I guess... I'd like to make that explicit. Let me draft a description for feed 1.
Although we hope for candidate-level specifications to remain unchanged until their upgrade to final status, we might still encounter errors to fix. Rather than making this a source of exciting surprises for implementors, we prefer to list those (hopefully few) changes here. Typos and other obvious mistakes will be fixed silently rather than cluttering this log.
^ to replace the old Necessary Changes
-headed intro.
Couple things I'd like to do:
By the way, is "breaking changes" language you explicitly tried to avoid? If so, you might not like https://github.com/earthstar-project/tsgen/commit/69e5328b6b5b73f63963f3a1bdd73f11d9a4639e