Ruby class parsing (sometimes) yields incorrect results.

[earwig]

If this includes adding things like >= and [], then good - otherwise, make note of that too.

[benattal]

=, [], ==, etc. are all considered functions in ruby. You can define each of these and how they behave on specific classes. Closing this issue.

[earwig]

Who would ever want to search for ruby code that uses >=?

[earwig]

The point is, there's a lot of them, and it potentially pollutes the database and makes it slower for other searches.

[benattal]

Ben... people who write ruby code define these methods (as I listed: >=, ==, ===, <<) on different objects all the time. The point of bitshift is to search for functions that are defined and used. These fall under that category for ruby.