Closed robert-mijakovic closed 11 months ago
@robert-mijakovic Can you check whether the changes in https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs/pull/19159 are sufficient to fix this problem?
cc @Flamefire
I assume though because https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs/pull/19021 is an exact duplicate of this and that is fixed by https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs/pull/19159 which I verified on our new Sapphire Rapids
I managed to get access to the machine again and I'm rebuilding the toolchain. I will let you know the outcome immediately once I finish the test. However, as @Flamefire emphasized, I don't expect to observe any issues with the testing phase as https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs/issues/19021 is a duplicate of his https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs/pull/19159.
I can confirm that https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs/pull/19159 fixes the issue.
Hi guys,
while building OpenBLAS on Sapphire Rapids running Ubuntu 22.04LTS, I faced "Too many LAPACK tests failed due to non-numerical errors: 55 (> 0)".
Are we too restrictive on tolerance? I will look further to see whether I can find a trace of recent patches in OpenBLAS. So far, I haven't seen anything. For the moment, I will stick to
--ignore-test-fail
when installing OpenBLAS 0.3.24 on Sapphire Rapids.Best regards, Robert