Closed davidnathanlang closed 3 years ago
This certainly is pretty strange behavior, and I can't tell if it's a bug or just an odd edge case. I'll dig into this, but I think the conformal inference procedure works better and is more stable, and this implementation of the jackknife+ might end up being dropped.
I wanted to make sure jackknife+ is working as intended? have an example where I was able to generate effect estimates that were outside the associated 95% confidence interval for a given week, specifically weeks 7 and 8 below. I understand that jackknife+ can construct asymmetric confidence intervals but it seems bizarre to have an estimate that doesn't fit inside it's own confidence intervals. Is this the intended behavior? @williamlief
Created on 2021-09-17 by the reprex package (v2.0.0)