Open amnonkhen opened 1 month ago
Not sure if still relevant and if in scope for 1st prod version.
The "temperature" fields in the mentioned checklist are:
Only the first one is the correct degree sign. The others use the "ordinal" sign. @Wkt8 is checking with Peter whether we should fix this.
On reflection, I prefer the simplicity of MIxS’ YAML wordy approach although it looks less cool, is less error prone: “degree Celsius”. My preference would be to move all temperature to “degree Celsius” as the unit, then we continue to converge on the GSC MIxS standard where no good reason not to, which is our general strategy. (This continues to increase the interoperable nature of our metadata). Would do you all think?
Enrique pointed out that "degree Celsius" is also the Unit Ontology's preferred term . It might make sense to do this switch.
This would be two parts:
Post production task as emulates current behaviour
We need to update the checklists to avoid encoding errors produced by bad usage of certain special chars
An example of this can be seen in checklist ERC000022, on the "temperature" fields with the units; They used different chars for the "degree" character (º), which leads to errors when displaying validation errors.
A suggestion on how to improve this came from a meeting, to add checks on checklist generation