Closed amnonkhen closed 3 years ago
Form that alerts wranglers in some way when the form has completed and its contents so a wrangler can review it contains: Name contact email address DOI/URL Optional Free text for additional comments
possible dependency in #313
Implementation Idea: Unsecured Post/Get endpoint on ingest-core that puts the project in the database but not in the catalogue with a wrangler status that allows them to find it.
new project with just:
Something we discussed was using the uniqueness check on doi to reject doi's those already exist in ingest, with nice error messages, for example:
If this implementation path is chosen we need to also add in #313 (or a dedicated page for listing New projects) so that the wranglers can triage and assign new projects suggested from the catalogue so that they can be reviewed for Eligibility.
If we are collecting the persons name and email could we also add that into the notes section on the admin page? (this is a nice to have! not essential so happy for it to be out of scope for now.)
need to consider GDPR and terms and conditions for this
Hi, @jacobwindsor and @MightyAx
Attached the suggested form for suggesting a project, I am only now doing the Thank you page, and will upload it here as well. Please ask me questions. (Updated the file, after Claire's comment)
Gabs
Can we have a tick box terms and conditions please - link is: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/data-protection/privacy-notice/human-cell-atlas-ingest-submission maybe just above the send button? @gabsie
Yes, just updated the image! Sorry And here is the Thank you page as well.![Suggest a project-thanks.png]
They look awesome, thank you!
Ah, I don't think I understood what a Project URL is and why it's a good substitute for Publication DOI. Is this so we can take pre-publication info?
I wanted to make it more flexible than simply a publication DOI, so people could use archive URLs, bioarchive URLs (which mostly but not always have a doi) their own website like the covid19 portal etc- lots of which was pre publication. Sounds like we need to change the wording or we perhaps need some examples after it to make that more obvious?
I think it just means we can't automatically put it through the DOI Enrichment routine we use for the UI / Script Loading. But perhaps that wasn't ever a requirement.
hey @jacobwindsor
I entered my details but it deosn't allow me to submit, while on the surface everything should be correct (using a real DOI)
changed my email to not be all caps worked. but the all caps one was from my remembered info
see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fSIPU85oDj_Ee09zyyHegHJwwy66vN-cGgn12hJC1B4/edit