ebi-ait / hca-ebi-wrangler-central

This repo is for tracking work related to wrangling datasets for the HCA, associated tasks and for maintaining related documentation.
https://ebi-ait.github.io/hca-ebi-wrangler-central/
Apache License 2.0
7 stars 2 forks source link

GSE145173 - Decoding myofibroblast origins in human kidney fibrosis #998

Closed ofanobilbao closed 11 months ago

ofanobilbao commented 1 year ago

GSE145173 - Decoding myofibroblast origins in human kidney fibrosis

Project short name:

Kramann-Human-Smartseq2

Primary Wrangler:

Arsenios Chatzigeorgiou @arschat

Secondary Wrangler:

Link to Ingest

Associated files

Published study links

Key Events

arschat commented 1 year ago

Number of mice samples not clear, neither for 10x data nor for Smart-Seq2. Contacted corresponding author to clarify.

arschat commented 1 year ago

Will proceed only with human data.

arschat commented 1 year ago

Deleted ncbi-cloud mouse data.

locate the sra_metadata_UUID.csv file that was created on cloud syncing. download file locally aws s3 cp s3://hca-ncbi-cloud-data/sra_metadata_b2338de6-2faa-4d5b-b731-4a8ba54a3212.csv . validate that the submission column has the correct SRA number(s) awk -F',' '{ print $43}' sra_metadata_b2338de6-2faa-4d5b-b731-4a8ba54a3212.csv | uniq save sra run IDs awk -F',' '{ print $1}' sra_metadata_b2338de6-2faa-4d5b-b731-4a8ba54a3212.csv > rm_ncbi_cloud_s3.csv read file with sra run IDs and delete corresponding directories in ncbi-cloud storage while read p; do aws s3 rm s3://hca-ncbi-cloud-data/$p --recursive; done < rm_ncbi_cloud_s3.csv delete sra_metadata_UUID.csv aws s3 rm s3://hca-ncbi-cloud-data/sra_metadata_b2338de6-2faa-4d5b-b731-4a8ba54a3212.csv

anu-shiva commented 1 year ago

@arschat to contact contributors for donor/specimen info

arschat commented 1 year ago

No update here, commenting just to specifying where dataset is stuck:

Inconsistent donor numbers between Supplementary Table 1 and Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1. See patients_table spreadsheet in google drive for more info. Possibly multiple specimens per donor not mentioned in paper.

Still waiting for author to reply.

arschat commented 1 year ago

Three follow-up emails has been sent from February, without an answer. See here and here