Open muthuvenkat opened 10 years ago
@G-Owen , @khaug all of them are synonyms, so in a way its not wrong, but we can fix it to make it consistent. origins.txt
Trying to fix those are well doable when the mismatch is created from a typo. Unfortunately many are just synonyms because of how the citation calls the species at that particular publication. On top of that there is the challenge of Species name without taxon. All these situations are now the accepted norm. Is it ok for your group?
How many entries does the query return now? Can we just do a direct database update on what's there? In regards to how important this is, I had completely forgotten that this case existed
This query returns 58 unique entries where different names apparently are used for the same taxon id:
select distinct c1.species_text, c2.species_text, c1.species_accession from compound_origins c1, compound_origins c2 where lower(trim(c1.species_text)) != lower(trim(c2.species_text)) and c1.species_accession = c2.species_accession;
Reported by: khaug