Hi,
I have a found a possible mistake in the ontology of the class 146179 (galactotriose). It is currently classified as a disaccharide as well as a trisaccharide. As the definition suggests, it should only be classified as a trisaccharide 27150.
Moreover, the class 146848 (selaginose) is classified as a glycosyl glycoside and a trisaccharide, where the definition says it is a glycosyl glycoside derivative. Because the molecule contains three monosaccharides connected at their anomeric centers, it should only be classified as a trisaccharide or at least as an glycosyl glycoside derivative 63356.
Hi, I have a found a possible mistake in the ontology of the class
146179
(galactotriose). It is currently classified as a disaccharide as well as a trisaccharide. As the definition suggests, it should only be classified as a trisaccharide27150
.Moreover, the class
146848
(selaginose) is classified as a glycosyl glycoside and a trisaccharide, where the definition says it is a glycosyl glycoside derivative. Because the molecule contains three monosaccharides connected at their anomeric centers, it should only be classified as a trisaccharide or at least as an glycosyl glycoside derivative63356
.Best regards,
Erik