Open alanbridge opened 2 months ago
I have added the relation CHEBI:79346 anionic ganglioside is_a CHEBI:28892 ganglioside in the Ontology, I hope it is accepted!
Hi @alanbridge
This is an inherent problem in ChEBI and there is no quick solution to this. Neutral compounds have a completely different hierarchy compared to their ionized counterparts. For example, in ChEBI we have amino-acid anions and amino-acid cations and they are not classified as amino acids via their hierarchy. Instead, a conjugate acid/base relationship is used to define the relationship between amino acids (which have net charge = 0) and their cation/anions.
I have now added a conjugate acid/base relationship between ganglioside and anionic ganglioside.
Hi Adnan,
hope you are doing well.
We have dozens if not more classes of anionic gangliosides in ChEBI and Rhea; but these are not currently classified as gangliosides, nor lipids. This issue impacts the ontology based search in Rhea:
https://www.rhea-db.org/rhea?query=chebi%3Aganglioside - 179 reactions involving a compound named ganglioside versus https://www.rhea-db.org/rhea?query=CHEBI%3A28892 - only 6 reactions involving a compound classed as a ganglioside
Could we start to address this by adding a relation between the two?
CHEBI:79346 anionic ganglioside is_a CHEBI:28892 ganglioside
Other suggestions welcome - thank you.
All the best, Alan
CC @aimol