Closed sno2 closed 2 years ago
I am also not saying that you should implement these features yourself. I am planning on implementing inlay hints because the Deno LSP is currently blocked on having inlay hints because tower-lsp
does not support it. However, inlay hints are in the proposed spec so there is no roadmap for me to integrate this feature into tower-lsp
which having this cargo feature-based system will help solve.
Hey @ebkalderon thanks for working on this project! Do you have any comment on this?
Sorry for the delayed response! Yeah, I wholeheartedly agree that matching the proposed
feature of the lsp-types
crate in this project would be a good idea, especially for supporting inlay hints and other features not yet in the official specification. I left a review on the linked PR with some minor feedback, but it looks great overall.
Closed in #330 and released in 0.17.0.
Hello, it would be great if we could have support for proposed features via a Cargo feature flag. This is currently what
gluon-lang/lsp-types
is doing to allow for using the latest features in the LSP specification version 3.17 (e.g. inlay hints). They simply block all proposed features to the spec under aproposed
cargo feature without any guarantees on breaking changes under this flag.