[x] Use of IHW with LRT? Shrunken FC w/ and w/o LRT? (in older version I think shrinkage was turned off for LRT, but now is no longer default) - BTW results with LRT doesn't require the name!
[x] STAR mapping with gtf + de_novo_gtf (also relevant for Rp-Bp)
[x] #1
[x] Add minimal testing
There is very little we can do for unit testing, and many of the functionalities are directly taken from rpbp, so it doesn't make sense to test them here. We could do some sort of regression testing using a small test data, similar to rpbp. The advantage is that we could do comparisons with other methods, if needed, and provide data similar to rpbp tutorials. I'm looking into polyester to simulate data.
All this would take a bit more time, but add value. I will open a separate issue in this case.
[x] Add minimal GA CI that installs code & runs tests (add codecov integration for test coverage)
For testing, we leave it there for now, I don't want to implement a suite of regression testing that would mostly test Rp-Bp functionalities. See above.
name
!gtf
+de_novo_gtf
(also relevant for Rp-Bp)There is very little we can do for unit testing, and many of the functionalities are directly taken from rpbp, so it doesn't make sense to test them here. We could do some sort of regression testing using a small test data, similar to rpbp. The advantage is that we could do comparisons with other methods, if needed, and provide data similar to rpbp tutorials. I'm looking into polyester to simulate data.
All this would take a bit more time, but add value. I will open a separate issue in this case.
For testing, we leave it there for now, I don't want to implement a suite of regression testing that would mostly test Rp-Bp functionalities. See above.