Occurs in xPath:
/cpacs/vehicles/aircraft/model/wings/wing/componentsegments/componentsegment/str
ucture/ribsdefinitions/ribsdefinition
/cpacs/vehicles/aircraft/model/wings/wing/componentsegments/componentsegment/str
ucture/spars
Problem/Question:
Ribs and Spars
Comments:
Why are rib definitions subdivided in ribsDefinition groups and can only one
single spar-set be defined? Seems somewhat inconsistent (the different
treatment in the buildup of CPACS). Now no numberOfSpars/spacing can be
defined. For conventional aircraft spar-sets this seems irrelevant, but what if
unconventional designs require this (e.g. BWB's for their fuselage/wing
connections)?
Reply:
wontFix
daniel.boehnke@dlr.de
Original issue reported on code.google.com by daniel.b...@googlemail.com on 25 Jan 2012 at 10:57
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
daniel.b...@googlemail.com
on 25 Jan 2012 at 10:57