davidfischer-ch
commented
11 years ago We should consider the type of licensing every component is and at the same time how they are integrated (library, external application, code snippet).
I let you choose the best license.
On 30 April 2013 14:43, EBU-TI notifications@github.com wrote:
Decide on the license used,
Bram will ask laywers from EBU on status of LGPL and European Union Public Licence (EUPL)
EUPL link: http://joinup.ec.europa.eu/software/page/eupl
Short article about EUPL license: http://www.eolevent.eu/sites/default/files/EUPL%20Interoperability.pdf
Then there is Creative Commons LGPL with commercial attribute. This is saying non-profit companies can use the software for free but for commercial companies there is a fee applicable.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/EBU-TI/OSCIED/issues/5 .
David Fischer Assistant HES des tcom http://eig.unige.ch/%7Etelecom/ @ hepiahttp://hepia.hesge.ch/ Ingénieur HES en télécommunications Tél. prof. : +4122 546 25 88 Mobile : +4176 616 78 12 Privé : +4132 510 92 12 Site : claire-et-david.ch
It's not a bug - it's an undocumented feature.http://www.journaldev.com/240/my-25-favorite-programming-quotes-that-are-funny-too
Decide on the license used,
Bram will ask laywers from EBU on status of LGPL and European Union Public Licence (EUPL)
EUPL link: http://joinup.ec.europa.eu/software/page/eupl
Short article about EUPL license: http://www.eolevent.eu/sites/default/files/EUPL%20Interoperability.pdf
Then there is Creative Commons LGPL with commercial attribute. This is saying non-profit companies can use the software for free but for commercial companies there is a fee applicable.