Closed valeriolorini closed 4 years ago
@valeriolorini can we close this?
yes, but a better solution is needed fr handling such cases, as now it's rn allowing -9999 values but maybe we'll have other variables doing it in future.
sure if it happens we'll think something more robust
Remember also that in the JIRA issue with the 1arcmin meteo maps we are using now a short integer with a scale offset. In this case the MV is -9999. I am not sure if this is related . In case not forget it.
We already discussed a possible solution: to check the min value of the file to see if it's lower than the usual -9999 and in case using -99999999 when we load the map into a pcraster object. This would apply to any map
Long Net Wave radiation can have values such as -9999 , we saw it in GloFAS. The workaround is to not classify no_data the -9999 values for the variable rn.