Open Luffy03 opened 2 years ago
Hi, the released dataset is only the validation set, not the full test set we used for the paper. We will open a codalab competition later which will enable people to test their model on the full test set.
Also the code in this repo should be able to reach a 60% or so performance on the validation set that I released using this command:
python3 main.py --data /path/to/download/ROBIN-cls-train/ --val-data /path/to/download/ROBIN-cls-val/ --pretrained
Hi, the released dataset is only the validation set, not the full test set we used for the paper. We will open a codalab competition later which will enable people to test their model on the full test set.
Also the code in this repo should be able to reach a 60% or so performance on the validation set that I released using this command:
python3 main.py --data /path/to/download/ROBIN-cls-train/ --val-data /path/to/download/ROBIN-cls-val/ --pretrained
I do follow this construction but the top-1 acc on val set is very low, as shown in the fig.......
The acc on the training set is normal
Would you please present the detailed results of your baseline method on the val set? It will help me a lot! thx!
Hi, we will update the repo with more information ASAP. For now, we are still preparing the data, please stay tuned.
Hi, we will update the repo with more information ASAP. For now, we are still preparing the data, please stay tuned.
Thank you very much! Looking forward to it.
Hi, Thanks again for your interest in our workshop, and we apologise for the late update. I have update the README in this repo and update a link to the full test set and labels in the README, the codalab submission server will also be online within this week.
Here are some changes to the competition:
Thanks again for your patience.
Best regards
Hello @DTennant
Could you please share the "full test set you used for the paper." I have compare your results with my results and thus i need full test dataset fro three tasks img cls, obj detec and pose.
Hello, thanks for your great work first! I run your provided baseline directly but get low performance. The results are quite different with that reported in your paper. Is there sth wrong with the code?