IDD 5.0 review discussion - Orchestration-store-management

AlexChiquito commented 8 months ago

In this Issue we will collect the comments about the orchestration-store-management interface definition.

emanuelpalm commented 8 months ago

Link to reviewed document: eu.arrowhead.orchestration-store-management-http-json.yml.

borditamas commented 8 months ago

AITIA review comments

File name should be 'service-orchestration-simple-store-management'
There is an inconsistency between the IDD and the SysD. SysD name this simple-store-management service, but IDD names orchestration-management-api
Every create, delete, modify operation should be bulk.
"configuration" phrase in the operation is confusing since there is the Configuration Support System. This one should be prefixed or renamed to emphasize the difference.

https://github.com/eclipse-arrowhead/roadmap/blob/5a4f4b2d3149288a48bda69337f7e041a05d0161/5.0%20Draft/IDD/IDDs%20Orchestration%20System/eu.arrowhead.orchestration-store-management-http-json.yml#L162-L169

Why setting the active configuration requires to define the rules again?

borditamas commented 6 months ago

@AlexChiquito @emanuelpalm @PerOlofsson-Sinetiq Could you please provide Sinetiq's feedback before the next RoadMap (05.02) in order to being able to discuss it there? As you know, last time the 14th of May (before AIMS 5.0 GA) was agreed to target the specification being finalized, so we don't have so much time.

eclipse-arrowhead / roadmap

IDD 5.0 review discussion - Orchestration-store-management #85

AITIA review comments