Closed noneghost closed 1 year ago
Hi @Noneghost, thank you for the PR. Before we can consider the PR we need the ECA to be signed. See here for more details.
Hi @Noneghost, thank you for the PR. Before we can consider the PR we need the ECA to be signed. See here for more details.
Hi @jonahgraham , I haved signed eca 3.1.0.
So, possibly take in, if we already know that there's an issue which is fixed by this? (I'm seeing the same issue - process is terminated but still "active" in the UI).
So, possibly take in, [...]
Sorry, I don't know what you mean by this part?
If you know that the known bug is fixed I suggest to pull that as-is, and adding "more missing things" later.
Thanks for expanding on what you meant. I am going to have a hard time accepting PRs without tests. But if @Noneghost is not able to code something up soon then I will look into this further.
Consider that when no threads are running the inferior is not running. This is needed so we don't suppress sending events to client on async stopped events from gdb
Fixes #233