Improve view names and descriptions

[ebugden]

Many view names and descriptions could be clarified/improved.

Examples of possible confusion:

• Histogram (A histogram of what? Can I choose what data to use?)
• Flame Chart (A flame chart of what?)
• Disk I/O View --> Disk I/O?
• IRQ Analysis (What is being analyzed? Or for noobs, what does IRQ mean?)

Name guidelines

Names should explain what data is shown (and ideally also suggest how it should be analyzed or why it is useful). The graph type isn't necessarily useful information

• Example: "Events over time" (Distribution of trace events in time) instead of "Histogram"

⚠️Changes to naming need to be made with extreme caution because they can be highly disruptive to established users (they need to reprogram their reflexes). @bhufmann @mirsky-work @MatthewKhouzam Do you know how open users are to naming changes?

Related: #275

[bhufmann]

The labels are provided created in the data provider descriptors in Trace Compass used by the trace server. The front-end has no knowledge about them, it just displays what the trace server provides. The updates need to be in Trace Compass / Trace server. I added the corresponding labels.

[ebugden]

Users mentioned this need in the user survey completed in November 2021.