eclipse-cdt / cdt

Eclipse CDT™ C/C++ Development Tools
http://eclipse.org/cdt
Eclipse Public License 2.0
309 stars 201 forks source link

CDT 11.0.0 #77

Closed jonahgraham closed 1 year ago

jonahgraham commented 2 years ago

This is the Release plan and TODO list for the release in the title. CDT makes its simrel contribution on +1 day in the release cycle (normally Monday by 10pm UTC).

Steps for M1

Items before M1 +1 day:

Items on M1 +0 day:

Items on M1 +1 day:

Items on M1 +4 day (or shortly after):

Steps for M2

Items on M2 +0 day:

Items on M2 +1 day:

Items on M2 +4 day (or shortly after):

Steps for M3

Items on M3 +0 day:

Items on M3 +1 day:

Items on M3 +4 day (or shortly after):

Steps for RC1

Items before RC1 +1 day:

Items on RC1 +0 day:

Items on RC1 +1 day:

Items on RC1 +4 day (or shortly after):

Steps for RC2

These steps should be done before RC2 release, they can be completed at anytime between the last branch creation/release and RC2.

Items before RC2 +1 day:

Items on RC2 +0 day:

Items on RC2 +1 day:

Items on RC2 +4 day (or shortly after):

Steps for Release

Items for quiet week (between RC2 and release):

Items to be done 2 days before release:

Release day:

jonahgraham commented 1 year ago

As discussed at our last call, I planned to prepare a draft release with plenty of time before the CDT 11.0.0 release.

The release is next Wednesday (Dec 7th).

Committers should be able to see the CDT 11.0.0 draft release here: https://github.com/eclipse-cdt/cdt/releases (please edit as you see fit, but do not publish it). PS I can't confirm that anyone else can see it, perhaps only I can see the draft?

In addition I added a link to a GitHub search for noteworthy issues and PRs to the N&N document: https://github.com/eclipse-cdt/cdt/blob/main/NewAndNoteworthy/CDT-11.0.md#noteworthy-issues-and-pull-requests

Please comment here on the issue with your thoughts.

jld01 commented 1 year ago

Hi @jonahgraham, do you think it's preferable/valuable to list the full set of PRs for milestone 11.0.0 on the release anouncement page as opposed to just the noteworthy PRs? Many of the non-noteworthy PRs will be of little interest to typical readers of the announcement. A counterargument is that every PR represents someone's effort towards the release and should be recognized.

jonahgraham commented 1 year ago

I had a similar thought - I like the autogenerated part(0), especially the New Contributors section(1). But I found it to be of little value(2), which is why I hid it behind the collapsible section(3).

(0) I imagine that as GitHub evolves the autogeneration will get more interesting too.

(1) In this release the "new contributors" section is a little off because we just moved to GitHub. You, me and @Torbjorn-Svensson aren't listed because we are listed in the 10.7.1 release page

(2) I agree with you about the value of recognizing someone's contribution. It can be a nice ego boost to see your name/contribution listed up front like that. The other value is it shows life of the project a little, similar purpose to the charts on PMI

PS I don't want to spend time manually maintaining a list. I think it is the auto-generated list, a link to the search, or I copy and paste the N&N into the release page.

jonahgraham commented 1 year ago

Update or create composites in preparation for going public on release day

I made a mistake in the above step, which is fixed in fb081b99759c77686ec51eca04bd89d577c36c83 but there is caching on download.eclipse.org which the p2 repo will present as slightly broken until the caches catch up.

They seem to be caught up for me already, but the GitHubActions seems to be seeing the old versions

jonahgraham commented 1 year ago

CDT 11.0.0 is done, onto CDT 11.1.0 in #202

PS. If we need a CDT 11.0.1 we can create that at short notice.