Open l0rd opened 2 years ago
Rework developers images to make them compatible with Red Hat internal image build tool (aka brew)
Note: downstream in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CRW-2463 and https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CRW-2464 we are required to have 3 images:
Or, we need a way to differentiate which devfile tiles in the dashboard are GA-supported / tech-preview. Perhaps a red outline or a ribbon on the tiles? Could also use this mechanism to differentiate Che samples from CRW samples.
Please consider adding here the following issue as a sub-task: https://github.com/eclipse/che/issues/21253 .
Or, we need a way to differentiate which devfile tiles in the dashboard are GA-supported / tech-preview. Perhaps a red outline or a ribbon on the tiles? Could also use this mechanism to differentiate Che samples from CRW samples.
We now have a way of labelling devfiles as "tech preview" or "community" via a label.
udi for GA support w/ openj9
And there's no longer openJ9 images downstream (https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CRW-3048).
So, at this point we could consider having the same devspaces-samples projects in both Che and Dev Spaces, augmented by some projects that are ONLY upstream.
This would reduce the sample list so we don't have slightly different samples for the same languages in up vs. down, and would make it more feasible to use the same (or a more-closely-aligned, less-forking-needed) UDI image in both up and downstream.
Issues go stale after 180
days of inactivity. lifecycle/stale
issues rot after an additional 7
days of inactivity and eventually close.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
in a new comment.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so.
Moderators: Add lifecycle/frozen
label to avoid stale mode.
/remove-lifecycle stale
Is your enhancement related to a problem? Please describe
Issues related to Developers images
Describe the solution you'd like
20798
20862
22029
20858
22009
22010
Additional context