.. but org.jvnet.mimepull parses this as a part with no headers and a content of "Content-Disposition: form-data; name=message"
This is demonstrated in the following failing Scala test:
import collection.JavaConversions._
import java.io._
class MimeParserSpec
extends Specification {
"org.jvnet.mimepull should understand empty BodyParts" in new Scope {
val body = """mime preamble
mime preamble
--rNmigcMAf6HIo0Q2xJ9-vjkH
Content-Disposition: form-data; name=root-fields
--rNmigcMAf6HIo0Q2xJ9-vjkH--"""
val mm = new org.jvnet.mimepull.MIMEMessage(
new ByteArrayInputStream(body.getBytes), "rNmigcMAf6HIo0Q2xJ9-vjkH")
mm.parseAll()
mm.getAttachments.toList must beLike {
case List(att) =>
CharStreams.toString(new InputStreamReader(att.readOnce)) mustEqual ""
}
}
}
.. this fails with 'Content-Disposition: form-data; name=root-fields' is not equal to ''
Raised from https://github.com/spray/spray/issues/874
RFC 822 specifies the structure of a "message", which is a MIME part.
It says that the CRLF is optional if the body is empty:
Also the current spec (rfc2046) for multipart messages has this in its grammar:
... so the following message is a valid MIME bundle with one empty part:
.. but org.jvnet.mimepull parses this as a part with no headers and a content of "Content-Disposition: form-data; name=message"
This is demonstrated in the following failing Scala test:
.. this fails with 'Content-Disposition: form-data; name=root-fields' is not equal to ''
Affected Versions
[1.9.4]