We are using JaCoCo in separate package to compute code coverage, with current master the values are not computed correctly anymore, we get 0% coverage for all packages.
Check why this does not work correctly anymore.
Also, is this report still relevant for our use case? As we do not publish the coverage anywhere, we could remove the separate package and describe in the README how to compute the coverage with EclEmma in Eclipse (also based on JaCoCo).
We are using JaCoCo in separate package to compute code coverage, with current master the values are not computed correctly anymore, we get 0% coverage for all packages.
Also, is this report still relevant for our use case? As we do not publish the coverage anywhere, we could remove the separate package and describe in the README how to compute the coverage with EclEmma in Eclipse (also based on JaCoCo).