Closed kenwenzel closed 1 year ago
BAMM is the meta-model for aspect models. It defines specific classes for Aspects, Entities, Properties and Characteristics. BAMM is used for defining aspect models for digital twins. Defining an ontology in BAMM is not possible and not intended. In the OMP I4.0 Core Information Model Whitepaper we have a section (see Chapter 7) that describes the commonalities and differences of BAMM and the OMP I4.0 Core Information Model as well as the usage of both for concrete projects.
We are investigating if it is helpful to adopt some of the OMP vocabulary for our AdaProQ project. Currently, we have own project-specific ontologies that also define some of the terms contained in this information model.
When screening the ontologies in this repository I have seen that they are defined in OWL. Now my question is why they are not defined with BAMM and how both should be combined.