As decided in the developer meetup from 2023-12-05, iceoryx_dust was merged back to iceoryx_hoofs. As a result, we need to have a more fine grained list of the quality levels for the components in iceoryx_hoofs.
It is upon downstream to decide which classes to use, we as upstream just need to make downstream aware of the quality level of each header.
This can be done by a matrix like the following (just a suggestion, TBD)
Component
Coverage
clang-tidy
Axivion
...
iox/vector
~100%
✅
✅
iox/detail/convert
~80%
✅
❌
If we include tools like Axivion in the matrix, we also need to state the rules which are followed else it is not possible for upstream to cooperate. It is totally fine though if this is just something that downstream adds but then it cannot be a criteria in the matrix.
Brief feature description
As decided in the developer meetup from 2023-12-05,
iceoryx_dustwas merged back toiceoryx_hoofs. As a result, we need to have a more fine grained list of the quality levels for the components in iceoryx_hoofs.https://github.com/eclipse-iceoryx/iceoryx/wiki/2023-12-05-Eclipse-iceoryx-developer-meetup#minutes
Detailed information
It is upon downstream to decide which classes to use, we as upstream just need to make downstream aware of the quality level of each header.
This can be done by a matrix like the following (just a suggestion, TBD)
If we include tools like Axivion in the matrix, we also need to state the rules which are followed else it is not possible for upstream to cooperate. It is totally fine though if this is just something that downstream adds but then it cannot be a criteria in the matrix.
Note: This was carved out of #2130