[#392] noisy logger

[elfenpiff]

Notes for Reviewer

Sets default log level to LogLevel:Warn.

Pre-Review Checklist for the PR Author

1. [x] Add sensible notes for the reviewer
2. [x] PR title is short, expressive and meaningful
3. [x] Relevant issues are linked in the References section
4. [x] Every source code file has a copyright header with SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 OR MIT
5. [x] Branch follows the naming format (iox2-123-introduce-posix-ipc-example)
6. [x] Commits messages are according to this guideline
   • [x] Commit messages have the issue ID ([#123] Add posix ipc example)
   • [x] Commit author matches Eclipse Contributor Agreement (and ECA is signed)
7. [x] Tests follow the best practice for testing
8. [x] Changelog updated in the unreleased section including API breaking changes
9. [x] Assign PR to reviewer
10. [x] All checks have passed (except task-list-completed)

Checklist for the PR Reviewer

• [x] Commits are properly organized and messages are according to the guideline
• [x] Unit tests have been written for new behavior
• [x] Public API is documented
• [x] PR title describes the changes

Post-review Checklist for the PR Author

1. [x] All open points are addressed and tracked via issues

References

Closes #392

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 79.00%. Comparing base (25dd2a6) to head (5070b05). Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

[](https://app.codecov.io/gh/eclipse-iceoryx/iceoryx2/pull/393?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=eclipse-iceoryx) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #393 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 79.44% 79.00% -0.44% ========================================== Files 193 193 Lines 22702 22702 ========================================== - Hits 18035 17936 -99 - Misses 4667 4766 +99 ``` | [Files with missing lines](https://app.codecov.io/gh/eclipse-iceoryx/iceoryx2/pull/393?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=eclipse-iceoryx) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [iceoryx2-bb/log/src/lib.rs](https://app.codecov.io/gh/eclipse-iceoryx/iceoryx2/pull/393?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=iceoryx2-bb%2Flog%2Fsrc%2Flib.rs&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=eclipse-iceoryx#diff-aWNlb3J5eDItYmIvbG9nL3NyYy9saWIucnM=) | `64.00% <ø> (ø)` | | ... and [19 files with indirect coverage changes](https://app.codecov.io/gh/eclipse-iceoryx/iceoryx2/pull/393/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=eclipse-iceoryx)

[elBoberido]

@elfenpiff do you think you could sneak in the new benchmark images for the main README in this PR?

[elfenpiff]

@elBoberido the benchmark images are already the newest ones. Take a look at the first image where iceoryx2 is close to zero and 10 times faster than iceoryx

[elBoberido]

Oh, I thought the one which compares the latency to the last release would be the default 😅