Closed jhemm2 closed 4 weeks ago
I made a proposal commit and removed the deprecated dependency. Furthermore, I have refactored the OslcClient to avoid duplicate code and added some unit-tests accordingly. Hth
The original change to control the Providers looks good. But noticed other refactoring that I could not review. Are you happy with them @berezovskyi then I am fine.
but @jhemm2 ! Please fix the unintended changes. I am afraid we will endup with many back-forth changes due to diffferent IDE settings.
Yes, I am fine with the changes.
Reformatting the code touched by the PR is intentional and welcomed/required.
With regards to the settings, there is sn .editorconfig file in the repo that everyone (cough) is expected to apply when reformatting.
But I have two further ideas on my bucket list:
Two more bits:
@berezovskyi editorconfig seems to be in place, but not sure if it makes a difference. go ahead then @jhemm2 !
can @jhemm2 commit to master, or should we do it?
@Jad-el-khoury not unless @jhemm2 becomes a committer ;)
Description
Adds another Constructor the OslcClient to allow custom registration of providers for the Client. This is due to registration of deprecated json providers by default
Checklist
Issues
Closes #636 ;
(use exactly this syntax to link to issues, one issue per statement only!)