Closed merks closed 1 month ago
@HannesWell @akurtakov @iloveeclipse
Given the I-build is broken, this, or something like this, needs to be merged sooner rather than later.
Should the bundle dependency be updated too?
I suppose that's a good idea too, yes.
6 files - 279 6 suites - 279 12s :stopwatch: - 48m 49s 4 tests - 3 577 4 :white_check_mark: - 3 501 0 :zzz: - 76 0 :x: ±0 12 runs - 10 923 12 :white_check_mark: - 10 692 0 :zzz: - 231 0 :x: ±0
Results for commit e041547a. ± Comparison against base commit f7070dbf.
@iloveeclipse
I think I cannot change the bound because the I-build is broken so the new p2 thingy isn't available yet. So I can either merge this change without verification or the bound needs to change later after a successful I-build.
What shall it be?
Merge and start new I-build. That way there is at least a chance to have it done at once.
Thank you Ed and sorry for the trouble! One really has to be very careful with P2, even if its internal. :/
I think I cannot change the bound because the I-build is broken so the new p2 thingy isn't available yet. So I can either merge this change without verification or the bound needs to change later after a successful I-build.
Even if the bound is satisfied the change can't succeed with a green verification, because without an I-build the changed method signatures are not available. So it's a chicken-egg problem not solvable with only green builds. So I agree that doing it at once is the best: Close your eyes and go (to say it with a badly translated German quote).
https://github.com/eclipse-equinox/p2/pull/550