eclipse-sparkplug / sparkplug

Sparkplug
Eclipse Public License 2.0
115 stars 39 forks source link

Question: Redundant normative statements #508

Open datafoo opened 9 months ago

datafoo commented 9 months ago

What do you want to know?

How is it relevant to have both of this sets of normative statements?

To me, they both seem equivalent and this duplication makes the specification longer to read than necessary.

Is this related to a Sparkplug Listing request? If so, link the issue from https://github.com/eclipse-sparkplug/sparkplug.listings here.

No response

Version

3.0.0 (Default)

Accept EFTL Terms

datafoo commented 9 months ago

Same with these other 2 sets:

datafoo commented 9 months ago

Another example:

Except in that case, there seems to be a copy-paste mistake (see #510).

datafoo commented 9 months ago

I would like to add that for me, reading such a specification requires extreme focus. Having to read redundant statements thinking there is a slight difference from previously read statements leads to unnecessary high mental efforts.

I believe the specification would be clearer and much easier to read without these redundant statements.