Currently, if the\addbibresource command is used in a different.tex file input e.g. via \input{tex/biblatex}, it is not recognised by Texlipse, so that I only get something along the lines of
lualatex.exe> Package biblatex Warning: Please (re)run Biber on the file:
lualatex.exe> (biblatex) document
lualatex.exe> (biblatex) and rerun LaTeX afterwards.
This practically breaks modularization of bigger projects, where I want to explicitly avoid having single package commands in the main tex file.
What is the current behavior?
Texlipse seems not to find \addbibresource if issued in a different than the main .tex file
What is the expected or desired behavior?
Either allow for \addbibresource in tex files input via \input{}, or allow more explicit selection of build steps.
@Article{0029-5515-57-10-102020,
author = {Wolf, R. C. and others},
title = {Major results from the first plasma campaign of the Wendelstein 7-X stellarator},
journaltitle = {Nuclear Fusion},
date = {2017-07-27},
volume = {57},
number = {10},
pages = {102020},
doi = {10.1088/1741-4326/aa770d},
}
Adding \addbibresource{bibliography/bibliography.bib} to document.tex makes it work.
Bug report
Currently, if the
\addbibresource
command is used in a different.tex
file input e.g. via\input{tex/biblatex}
, it is not recognised by Texlipse, so that I only get something along the lines ofThis practically breaks modularization of bigger projects, where I want to explicitly avoid having single package commands in the main tex file.
What is the current behavior?
Texlipse seems not to find
\addbibresource
if issued in a different than the main.tex
fileWhat is the expected or desired behavior?
Either allow for
\addbibresource
in tex files input via\input{},
or allow more explicit selection of build steps.Please provide steps to reproduce:
document.tex:
biblatex.tex:
bibliography/bibliography.bib:
Adding
\addbibresource{bibliography/bibliography.bib}
todocument.tex
makes it work.Please describe your environment:
Operating system: