Closed mhellmeier closed 1 year ago
I would suggest to archive the repo (see https://otterdog.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reference/organization/repository/), using archived: true .
At a later time, these repos can still be removed if needed. So far the puris repo is still empty as the PR to initialize it has not been approved yet.
Just set the archive option as suggested. It would be great if you could review it again, @netomi.
change LGTM. However is this change coordinated with the infra team? I am not aware how the project handles itself, but there seems to be a separate team and repo with stuff like that: https://github.com/eclipse-tractusx/sig-infra/issues
It would be good if requests are approved there and then referenced to PRs here, that way we could speed up the process imho.
@SebastianBezold @Siegfriedk would do you think about that?
@netomi yes this is our workflow you linked and we are currently trying to refine it with the documentation and issue flow.
Good suggestion to have an issue on our repo first.
Might take a few days to write it down, we are in the middle of a release and holiday season
The open PR has been merged, I will now also apply this change.
change has been applied, the 2 repos have been archived.
As discussed in #10, the new
puris
repository substitutes the old repospuris-frontend
andpuris-backend
. Since the new repository is created including an initial contribution in https://github.com/eclipse-tractusx/puris/pull/1, the old repositories aren't used anymore and can therefore be deleted.