Closed SebastianBezold closed 6 months ago
@danielmiehle and @maximilianong mentioning you here for your information. Following up on our discussion, that we want to step away from duplicated KIT content. What do you think about archiving "Eco Pass" and completely deleting the other two? Beside the open PR on PCF exchange, i cannot see any content there. I bet, that the PR contents are already included on our website, but did not verify yet
@SebastianBezold yes, removing the relevant repo entry from the config would delete it once the change gets approved and merged.
@SebastianBezold yes, removing the relevant repo entry from the config would delete it once the change gets approved and merged.
Nice. Adjusted the PR to remove the two empty repos: 122cd31
Approved.
changes are live.
Description
There are some standalone KIT repositories, containing some markdown files. The exact same files are used to build our eclipse-tractusx.github.io website. This means we are duplicating content and even add more maintenance effort for keeping legal documentation up-to-date.
The repositories in question are:
The KITs representation on our webiste:
Further notes
@netomi: How would I completely DELETE a repository? Will removing the entry completely do the trick, or will it just make the repo "unmanaged"? I think
pcf-exchange-kit
andonline-simulation-kit
could be deleted, since there is no content yet in the repo, while the KITs are already represented on the websiteRelated issues
Closes eclipse-tractusx/pcf-exchange-kit#4 Closes eclipse-tractusx/online-simulation-kit#2