the api parameter bomLifycle can thus become obsolete? We can determine the BomLifycle for an asset via the AAS and determine the traversal aspect from this determination
digitalTwinType MUST be used to detect correct BOMLifecylce to have a detemined determination of the BomLifycle in order to be able to give the caller a coherent error message.
As-Is: The Bomifecyle is assumed to be correct for a globalAssetId - In case the TraversalAspect for the BOMLifycle defined via the api parameter BOMLifycle does not exisits the irs provides a tombstone - In this case it is not proven if the requestor has defined the wrong BomLifecyle for the request or the BomLifecyle is correct and TraversalAspect does not exist. By using the digitalTwinType parameter, the detection would be more reliable.
[ ] Clarification for hasAlternatives with a BOMLifecycle switch in the supply chain from asPlanned to asBuilt
Decision 2024-03-14
API parameter bomLifecycle is not required any more - detection of bomLifecyle could be managed by the AAS parameter digitalTwinType
Clarification
In case batch api endpoint is called with different bomLifecyle would this lead to a valid jobResponse
As Business Owner I want to adjust to AAS and DTR so that IRS is conform with IndustryCore standard CX-0126 and CX-0127
Link
Discussion
Decision 2024-03-14
Clarification
Hints / Details
Acceptance Criteria
Out of Scope